Critical Medical Anthropology and how does it influence health and healthcare problems?
There are some conflicts between critical medical anthropologists and applied medical anthropologists. Many critical medical anthropologists have criticized applied medical anthropologists as being conservative, as they work within the system, only managed to change what was necessary of them to change so that things 'remained the same' (Joralemon, 2009, p. 98). Other anthropologists ridicule applied medical anthropologists as being 'timid' and afraid to offend their medical colleagues, and that they are only there to help aid physicians in better controlling their patients and to depoliticize health problems by treating them individually rather than social problems (Joralemon, 2009).
Critical applied medical anthropologists without remorse confront medical teachers, researchers, and practitioners with evidence of the political and economic interests in biomedicine (Joralemon, 2009). This approach helps to adopt an explicit advocacy role for patients and would bring to bear a wider social analysis to disease (Joralemon, 2009). They help to reverse health problems associated with environmental pollution, occupational hazards, and poor living conditions (Joralemon, 2009). Merrill Singer, a critical medical anthropologist, explains that the applied medical anthropologist works within the realm of common theories, while critical anthropologists challenge or contrast these theories (Singer, 2004).
Was Critical medical anthropology used in the story of "The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down"?
The concept of critical medical anthropology does not simply corroborate within the walls of theories but challenges them. Maintaining a situation is not as beneficial as improving it. In challenging a theory or system, improvement is usually birthed from this process. Striving to improve health and healthcare problems is the goal isn't it? Rather than maintain a status quo, shouldn't the goal be to improve it? In Anne Fadiman's book, applying critical medical anthropology would have definitely benefitted the Lee's and potentially provided a brighter future for Lia. If the providers weren't close minded to the fact that maybe something else should have been done to improve this young child's case. Challenging the system of healthcare, this could have potentially provided for an efficient healthcare plan for not only tho family, but for families in the future as well. There is no saying how many families in this time period were also burdened and harmed by the lack of cultural competence as well as medical anthropology.
Images #5 as banner and Image #6 of The Spirit Catches You and you fall down book.
There are some conflicts between critical medical anthropologists and applied medical anthropologists. Many critical medical anthropologists have criticized applied medical anthropologists as being conservative, as they work within the system, only managed to change what was necessary of them to change so that things 'remained the same' (Joralemon, 2009, p. 98). Other anthropologists ridicule applied medical anthropologists as being 'timid' and afraid to offend their medical colleagues, and that they are only there to help aid physicians in better controlling their patients and to depoliticize health problems by treating them individually rather than social problems (Joralemon, 2009).
Critical applied medical anthropologists without remorse confront medical teachers, researchers, and practitioners with evidence of the political and economic interests in biomedicine (Joralemon, 2009). This approach helps to adopt an explicit advocacy role for patients and would bring to bear a wider social analysis to disease (Joralemon, 2009). They help to reverse health problems associated with environmental pollution, occupational hazards, and poor living conditions (Joralemon, 2009). Merrill Singer, a critical medical anthropologist, explains that the applied medical anthropologist works within the realm of common theories, while critical anthropologists challenge or contrast these theories (Singer, 2004).
Was Critical medical anthropology used in the story of "The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down"?
The concept of critical medical anthropology does not simply corroborate within the walls of theories but challenges them. Maintaining a situation is not as beneficial as improving it. In challenging a theory or system, improvement is usually birthed from this process. Striving to improve health and healthcare problems is the goal isn't it? Rather than maintain a status quo, shouldn't the goal be to improve it? In Anne Fadiman's book, applying critical medical anthropology would have definitely benefitted the Lee's and potentially provided a brighter future for Lia. If the providers weren't close minded to the fact that maybe something else should have been done to improve this young child's case. Challenging the system of healthcare, this could have potentially provided for an efficient healthcare plan for not only tho family, but for families in the future as well. There is no saying how many families in this time period were also burdened and harmed by the lack of cultural competence as well as medical anthropology.
Images #5 as banner and Image #6 of The Spirit Catches You and you fall down book.